The program verb does not refer to this word, but to demonstration – it is the act of protesting, it is not the programs that have provided the support mentioned here that has the correct form of verb: „The demonstration of effective continuous monitoring programs has also helped leading institutions meet increased regulatory expectations.“ In #4, I don`t see how patchwork is a subject. The theme is federal and regional regulations. Banks are the plural subject. What are the banks doing? They therefore record „store“ is the plural verb associated with the plural theme. What do they store? They store money, so „money“ is the object. When creating sentences, authors must ensure that verbs are bent to match the subject – the word or phrase to which the verb refers – which is not necessarily the neighbouring subprov. The following sentences, which are discussed and revised under the examples, show the different pitfalls that can be encountered with this theme. There are a few unique words that people often stumble up. All the following words are singular and require a singular verb: Hello, Renee, In the sentence in question: The patchwork (federal and regional orders) has companies with great uncertainty as to how to comply, note that the preposition of „federal and state regulations“ is an „adjective sentence“ that changes the very subject of the sentence that is „patchwork“. „Patchwork“ is singular, and the verb of the sentence must therefore correspond to: „The patchwork… a „instead of the fake“ Patchwork… „In sentence A, „One“ is the object of the sentence, and one of them is singular. There is no way to go.
Some people find ways to argue that „none“ is not singular, but „none is“ acceptable, but I absolutely cannot see it. If „one“ is singular, „zero“ is also singular. In sentence B, we do arithmetic in the form of words, and „a third“ is multiplication. If z.B. the number of new teachers is 999, then (1/3) x (999) – 333, which is still plural. In this second sentence, the three verbs do not correspond to their subject. A subject-verb dissent is when we use the plural form verb for a single form noun or a monoform word for a plural noun, for example „it reads“ or „reads.“ In the text, there are the three subject-verbal dissents: 1. „App, people ask“ should be: „App that asks people,“ because the app is a unique name. 2. „There is a difference,“ the correct form would be: „There is a difference“ because difference is a singular nominant. 3.
„What the public really wants“ should be what the public really wants, because the audience is a unique nostun. The theme is the new bike paths. It`s a plural subject. But verbs If two options are presented as alternatives and not as a combination, with or instead of binding them, a singular verb is appropriate, because it applies only to the first option: „The implementation of simplified solutions based on symptomatic causes, or a single cause, if there are several causes of interaction, is very likely that it ends in failure and disappointment.“ There is something at the end of the problem, one of them that is best placed to leave two parallel examples, when we could do much more: A. One in three new teachers left the profession in three years. B. One third of new teachers have left their profession in three years. (By way of a marginal remark, the „save“ makes a transitive verb because it acts on an object.) It is a general rule that, if we have a construction or/or(or or) construction, the verb corresponds to the following subject (in this case conflict) which is singular in the third person, so that it must be followed by the verb which, on the other hand, subject-verb disunity is simply the absence of that agreement.